Am I crazy, or have some broadcast TV shows have been tackling more complex, philosophically challenging concepts lately? Obviously there’s my beloved “Hannibal,” but there’s also “The Last Man on Earth,” which–at least when it was about a last man on Earth–was a fascinating study of a thought experiment everyone’s probably pondered. Will that trend continue in 2015? Or will every show just be a clone of “The Blacklist”? Only one way to tell: watch more television. For the moment, I’ve settled for five premiers.
An FBI agent (Sullivan Stapleton) discovers Jane Doe (Jaimie Alexander), a naked woman covered in tattoos, in a duffle bag in the middle of Times Square. Doe has no memory of her identity, but she can speak Mandarin, knows Brazilian jujitsu and her tattoos appear to be clues to upcoming international crimes. Deciding that these might be skills useful for both figuring out who she is and helping the FBI fight crime, the FBI enlists her to help them figure out who she is and fight crime.
NBC’s new show has a cute premise, and it certainly could lend itself to philosophical speculation. Memory has always been attached to theories of identity, from the Roman orator Seneca to Christopher Nolan’s “Memento.” “Blindspot” seems to be taking an existentialist slant right off the bat. Memory is not identity, but choice is, one FBI analyst says to Doe, urging her, if she can’t remember old choices, to make new ones.
Nevertheless, the show is fairly artless in its production. There is nothing visually outstanding, and the performances, while solid, lack nuance–with the possible exception of Alexander, who looks mildly surprised by her hidden talents as they emerge. We’ll see how the character of Doe develops, but my suspicions are that “Blindspot” will prove to be an entertaining, but not engaging, piece of high concept…unless the show keeps playing with notions of identity.
Between Fox’s “Minority Report” and Amazon’s “Man in the High Castle,” reality bending sci fi writer Philip K. Dick is having a small screen emergence. I am a tremendous PKD fan, but I try to be wary of adaptations, so I had high-ish hopes for “Minority Report” The show takes place a few years after the film of the same name; the precogs, who saw the future and foiled crimes before they happened, have been set free, and crimes are solved like they were in the old days. However, precog Dash (Stark Sands) seeks out sympathetic Detective Lara Vega (Meagan Good) so he can put his partial powers back to use as a crime solving seer.
There was hardly a sci fi writer more metaphysically profound than PKD, so one kind of expects at least a little metaphysical profundity from adaptations of his work. No such luck with “Minority Report.” The first episode actually brought up the issue of arresting people who haven’t committed crimes yet–suggesting themes like fate and individual freedom. But “Minority Report” dodged dealing this those issues almost immediately, and it looks like it will follow a standard monster-of-the-week format. Of course, a show doesn’t have to be philosophically profound to be good, but it certainly helps, especially when it’s offering up the potential of a story penned by Philip K. Dick. I’m no precog but, to quote the eight ball, “outlook not so good.” Oh well. I might keep watching, but I’ll retain my higher hopes for “Man in the High Castle.”
There were a few reasons why I had been looking forward to the premier of this. First off, just look at that lineup: showrunners Brad Falchuk and Ryan Murphy (“American Horror story”), and actresses Emma Roberts (“Scream 4”) and Jamie Lee Curtis (“Halloween”). Also, I just came off a ten-hour high of MTV’s “Scream” (I binge watched the series in a day), so I figured watching the two-hour premier of “Scream Queens” would be a breeze.
Well, it was. “Scream Queens” was delightfully over the top, funny in the most comically inappropriate places and gory in all the right spots. Someone is killing the sisters of Kappa House. The sorority’s fearless leader is the outburst prone ice queen Chanel Oberlin (Roberts), who tries to rally the sisters and figure out who is mowing the heads off of sorority rushes, all while hiding a few bodies in an oversized freezer herself.
Is “Queens” a deep show? Not really, although you might make the argument that it has a class system critique going on (ABC’s soapy “Blood and Oil” has similar possibility), and it certainly takes comical advantage of teen culture. It is, however, handsomely photographed–between this and “Gotham,” Fox has the best looking shows on broadcast. The question is how long can “Queens” maintain? Playing for camp can be very effective, but there is a fine line between lame and lunacy. “AHS” sometimes got so over the top it toppled over, but perhaps by grounding “Queens” in realit–no supernatural (so far)–it will stay down to earth. As for still looking pretty…that’s just a matter of keeping smart people in the director’s seat.
Alex Parrish (Priyanka Chopra), with about 50 others, heads to Quantico for the final phase of FBI training. Nine months later, New York is rocked by a terrorist attack helmed by a traitorous member of the Parrish’s graduating class. She’s the chief suspect so, as is the way of things, Parrish goes on the run to solve the case herself and clear her name.
Pleasantly produced, “Quantico” is easy on the eyes–and I’m not just talking about the cast (ABC clearly has a couple of bucks to spend here). There is also the potential, if not downright demand, for psychological speculation on what makes traitors and patriots tick, but if the writers play their cards right, there might also be some serious debate about identity and morality as well. I would have loved to see a “Usual Suspects”/”True Detective”-style juxtaposition between the past and the present, but it looks like “Quantico” has taken us out of the interrogation room. No doubt tension will now arise from more physical and carnal, and less subtle, sources. Regardless, even if the show doesn’t raise too many deeper issues, it looks like a promising new thriller. At least it looks a little different. Case in point…
I am only familiar with the premise of the film “Limitless”: average Joe takes smart pill and finds himself in thriller. In the case of CBS’s new thriller, the average Joe is adult loser Brian Finch (Jake McDorman), who is given super brain drug NZT by a friend to make something of himself. When his friend who turns up dead, Finch is pursued by FBI agent Rebecca Harris (“Dexter’s” Jennifer Carpenter), who believes he probably is the murderer. But she’s got a soft spot for him, so not only does Harris help Finch clear his name, she takes him on as a permanent assignment to trace the source of the NZT.
The premier of “Limitless” picked up some of the movie’s “ain’t-this-cool” sheen, from the way the world transformed from drab blue to vibrant gold when Finch took his medicine to his constant narration, interspersed with graphs and time-lapse photography to explain his motivations to the audience. The fourth wall is still in tact, but Finch is certainly chipping at it. However, the notions of drug abuse that were part of film have apparently been swept under the rug by the end of the first episode, so it looks like we’re in for a “guy with special powers helps the FBI stop a monster-of-the-week” show.
Wait a second, why does that sound familiar? Right, there were two other shows I just talked about that can be reduced to that formula: person with interesting powers helps the FBI (the Federal Bureau of Investigation in “Blindspot” and “Limitless,” the Future Bureau of Investigation in “Minority Report”) to solve crimes. This is not so promising.
I realize my beloved “Hannibal” was superficially the same formula…although, to be fair, it was a slight subversion of “let’s help the FBI”; likewise, I haven’t heard “Minority Report” or “Limitless” compared to a pretentious art film, nor have I heard their characters discuss the nature of reality. As soon as that happens, believe me, I’ll be happy to apologize.